What’s the definition of comedy? Banana. – Addison Anderson

What’s the definition of comedy? Banana. – Addison Anderson

What’s the definition of comedy? Thinkers and philosophers from Plato and Aristotle to Hobbes, Freud, and beyond, including anyone misguided enough to try to explain a joke, have pondered it, and no one has settled it. You’re lucky you found this video to sort it out. To define comedy, you should first ask why it seems comedy defies definition. The answer’s simple. Comedy is the defiance of definition because definitions sometimes need defiance. Consider definition itself. When we define, we use language to set borders around a thing that we’ve perceived in the whirling chaos of existence. We say what the thing means and fit that in a system of meanings. Chaos becomes cosmos. The universe is translated into a cosmological construct of knowledge. And let’s be honest, we need some logical cosmic order, otherwise we’d have pure chaos. Chaos can be rough, so we build a thing that we call reality. Now think about logic and logos, that tight knot connecting a word and truth. And let’s jump back to thinking about what’s funny, because some people say it’s real simple: truth is funny. It’s funny because it’s true. But that’s simplistic. Plenty of lies are funny. Comedic fiction can be funny. Made-up nonsense jibberish is frequently hilarious. For instance, florp — hysterical! And plenty of truths aren’t funny. Two plus two truly equals four, but I’m not laughing just because that’s the case. You can tell a true anecdote, but your date may not laugh. So, why are some untruths and only some truths funny? How do these laughable truths and untruths relate to that capital-T Truth, the cosmological reality of facts and definitions? And what makes any of them funny? There’s a Frenchman who can help, another thinker who didn’t define comedy because he expressly didn’t want to. Henri Bergson’s a French philosopher who prefaced his essay on laughter by saying he wouldn’t define “the comic” because it’s a living thing. He argued laughter has a social function to destroy mechanical inelasticity in people’s attitudes and behavior. Someone doing the same thing over and over, or building up a false image of themself and the world, or not adapting to reality by just noticing the banana peel on the ground — this is automatism, ignorance of one’s own mindless rigidity, and it’s dangerous but also laughable and comic ridicule helps correct it. The comic is a kinetic, vital force, or elan vital, that helps us adapt. Bergson elaborates on this idea to study what’s funny about all sorts of things. But let’s stay on this. At the base of this concept of comedy is contradiction between vital, adaptive humanity and dehumanized automatism. A set system that claims to define reality might be one of those dehumanizing forces that comedy tends to destroy. Now, let’s go back to Aristotle. Not Poetics, where he drops a few thoughts on comedy, no, Metaphysics, the fundamental law of non-contradiction, the bedrock of logic. Contradictory statements are not at the same time true. If A is an axiomatic statement, it can’t be the case that A and the opposite of A are both true. Comedy seems to live here, to subsist on the illogic of logical contradiction and its derivatives. We laugh when the order we project on the world is disrupted and disproven, like when the way we all act contradicts truths we don’t like talking about, or when strange observations we all make in the silent darkness of private thought are dragged into public by a good stand-up, and when cats play piano, because cats that are also somehow humans disrupt our reality. So, we don’t just laugh at truth, we laugh at the pleasurable, edifying revelation of flaws, incongruities, overlaps, and outright conflicts in the supposedly ordered system of truths we use to define the world and ourselves. When we think too highly of our thinking, when we think things are true just because we all say they’re logos and stop adapting, we become the butt of jokes played on us by that wacky little trickster, chaos. Comedy conveys that destructive, instructive playfulness, but has no logical definition because it acts upon our logic paralogically from outside its finite borders. Far from having a definite definition, it has an infinite infinition. And the infinition of comedy is that anything can be mined for comedy. Thus, all definitions of reality, especially those that claim to be universal, logical, cosmic, capital-T Truth become laughable.

Only registered users can comment.

  1. And this is why the more special snowflakes try to censor comedians from joking about "certain things", the more those comedians will joke about those things.

  2. Does this video intentionally use difficult words. English isn't my first language, and I didn't understand more than half the shit he was talking about.

  3. Comedy is laughing about what we consider inferior; that is, disability.
    Humans evolved above all animals and are conscious of being superior. So, when we see a disabled person, the automatic defence mechanism we developed make us quickly expand our lungs in order to get more air and avoid becoming disabled as well

  4. Comedy happens when something is put out of the natural order of the Universe, and someone steps out of reality to point it out and play with it joyfully for a bit.
    Tragedy is the same, except you don't play with it joyfully, you do it empathically.

  5. Most of the comedy portrayed in this video seemed like it was humor that degraded rather than supported the laughed at individual. Is this normal?

    Or am I looking at humor from the wrong perspective? I tend to avoid humor that appears to degrade an individual rather than support, but perhaps I am thinking about it all wrong? Please let me know what you think!

  6. the video is titled "the definition of comedy" not "here are some funny things". when you start to define a joke, you kill it.

  7. If you pause the video a couple of times, and think about what he is saying, then you'll understand most of what he's saying.

  8. Going back through the video, I think the speaker says (circa 4:26) that anything can be comedy and those that rely on a strict logical view of the world and comedy become jokes themselves.

    He gives examples of Bergson and Aristotle and their interpretations of comedy.

  9. its not as difficult as he has made it. even if you read bergson's essay on the meaning of comic, you dont get mind boggled as this video makes you.

  10. My view is that anything logically can be comedy to anyone as long as it is told in a certain way to a certian person. e.g i could say "florp" and no-one would laugh but if someone else said " florp! " someone may find that funny to them.

  11. Simple resumè: We create in our brains, ways to try to put order in chaos, but sometimes things doesn't simple end as we TOMATO

  12. man if they could do our studies in animation like this explaining we all would be thomas jefferson or eistein right now if only people agreed with me

  13. Yeah…Ted-Ed really screwed this video up. They hired a philosopher to write a dissertation on Comedy for children. Couldn't use this clip in a classroom if the author himself was teaching the lesson.

  14. It kind of feels like he tries to make a point out of unconnected stuff that don't have to do anything with the awnser of the question.

  15. Laughter is like air! Without it, you die!
    Laughter is like water! Without it, you die!
    Laughter is also like fried chicken! Without it, your already shortened life is depressing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *